Article & News

Category: Case Analysis

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED vs. A.S. RAGHAVENDRA

The Supreme Court adjudicated on whether the respondent, employed as the Regional Business Head (South), was a “workman” under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes

CHANDAN vs. THE STATE (DELHI ADMN.)

This case explores the evidentiary weight of ocular testimony when the motive for a crime is absent. The appellant, Chandan, was convicted under Section 302