Effect of Death on or Before the Accrual of the Right to Sue

Articles

Effect of Death on or Before the Accrual of the Right to Sue

January 11, 2025

In Indian law, the death of a person before the accrual of the right to sue can significantly impact the computation of limitation periods for initiating legal proceedings. Section 16 of the Limitation Act, 1963, addresses this scenario, ensuring that the legal representatives of the deceased have a fair opportunity to pursue or defend claims

MEANING AND EXPLANATION

Section 16 of the Limitation Act, 1963, deals with situations where a person entitled to sue or liable to be sued dies before the right to sue accrues. The provision ensures that the limitation period is computed from the time when there is a legal representative capable of instituting or defending a suit. This provision prevents the injustice that might occur if the limitation period were to run without any party capable of initiating or defending the action.

LEGAL PROVISIONS

The relevant text of Section 16 is as follows:

Subsection (1): If a person who would have had the right to institute a suit or make an application dies before the right accrues, or if the right accrues only upon the death of a person, the limitation period is computed from the time when there is a legal representative capable of instituting such suit or making such application.
Subsection (2): If a person against whom a right to institute a suit or make an application would have accrued dies before the right accrues, or if the right accrues upon the death of such person, the limitation period is computed from the time when there is a legal representative against whom the plaintiff may institute such suit or make such application.
Subsection (3): This section does not apply to suits to enforce rights of pre-emption or to suits for the possession of immovable property or of a hereditary office.

ESSENTIALS FOR APPLICABILITY

For Section 16 to apply, the following conditions must be met:

The death must occur before the right to institute a suit or make an application accrues.
There must be a legal representative capable of instituting or defending the suit.
The provision does not apply to suits enforcing rights of pre-emption or seeking possession of immovable property or hereditary offices.

CASE LAW

In Rajja Bibi v. Chhotay Lal (1996), the Allahabad High Court held that where, after executing a mortgage by conditional sale, the mortgagor died before the period of reconveyance expired, the period of limitation would be computed from the time when the legal representative of the deceased became capable of instituting the suit for redemption of the mortgage and recovery of possession.

EXCEPTIONS

Section 16(3) explicitly states that its provisions do not apply to:

Suits to enforce rights of pre-emption.
Suits for the possession of immovable property.
Suits for the possession of a hereditary office.

COMPARISON WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS

While Indian law provides specific provisions under Section 16 of the Limitation Act, 1963, to address the effect of death on the accrual of the right to sue, other jurisdictions may have different approaches. For instance, in common law systems like the United Kingdom, the Limitation Act, 1980, addresses similar issues but with variations in the specifics of the provisions. It’s essential to understand these differences, especially in cases involving cross-border legal matters.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Understanding the implications of Section 16 is crucial for legal practitioners and students:

Timely Action: Legal representatives must be aware of their rights and the commencement of limitation periods to avoid being time-barred.
Documentation: Proper documentation and timely appointment of legal representatives are essential to ensure the smooth initiation or defense of legal proceedings.

CONCLUSION

Section 16 of the Limitation Act, 1963, plays a vital role in ensuring that the death of an individual before the accrual of the right to sue does not unjustly impede legal proceedings. By resetting the limitation period from the time a legal representative becomes capable of acting, the law balances the interests of justice and procedural efficiency.