Suits by or Against Government: Section 79-82 CPC

Sections 79 to 82 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, delineate the procedures for instituting suits by or against the government and public officers. These provisions ensure that legal actions involving governmental entities adhere to a standardized process, balancing the interests of individuals and the state.

SECTION 79 CPC: SUITS BY OR AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT

Section 79 specifies the proper designation of parties when initiating legal proceedings involving the government. It mandates that in suits by or against the Central Government, the entity should be named as the “Union of India,” and in cases involving a State Government, it should be referred to as the “State.” This standardization prevents misnomers and ensures clarity in legal documentation. The Supreme Court, in Chief Conservator of Forests, Government of A.P. v. Collector, emphasized that the requirements of Section 79 are substantive and not merely procedural formalities.

SECTION 80 CPC: NOTICE

Before instituting a suit against the government or a public officer for actions performed in an official capacity, Section 80 requires the plaintiff to serve a two-month prior notice. This notice must detail the cause of action, the relief sought, and the plaintiff’s particulars. The intent is to provide the government an opportunity to address grievances without litigation. However, sub-section (2) allows for suits seeking urgent relief to be filed without such notice, provided the court grants permission and the government is given a chance to respond before any relief is granted. In State of A.P. v. Pioneer Builders, the Supreme Court underscored the mandatory nature of this notice, stating that no suit can be filed against the government or a public officer unless the requisite notice under Section 80 has been served.

SECTION 81 CPC: EXEMPTION FROM ARREST AND PERSONAL APPEARANCE

This section offers certain protections to public officers sued for actions conducted in their official capacity. It exempts them from arrest and their property from attachment, except when executing a decree. Additionally, if the court believes that the officer’s duties would suffer due to personal court appearances, it can exempt them from appearing in person, allowing legal representation instead.

SECTION 82 CPC: EXECUTION OF DECREES

Section 82 outlines the procedure for executing decrees against the government or public officers. It stipulates that such decrees cannot be executed until three months have passed from the date of the decree. This provision grants the government adequate time to comply with the court’s decision or to consider an appeal. The Supreme Court, in Union of India v. Kisan Khandelwal, held that a decree should be executed only if it is brought to an executable stage, emphasizing that the period of limitation starts only after this stage is reached.

ORDER XXVII CPC: SUITS BY OR AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT OR PUBLIC OFFICERS

Order XXVII complements Sections 79 to 82 by detailing the procedural aspects of such suits. It specifies that government pleaders represent the government in these cases and provides guidelines for filing written statements or affidavits. The order also addresses issues like the extension of time for government representatives, considering the bureaucratic processes involved.

KEY JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS

  • Jehangir v. Secretary of State (1904): The Bombay High Court clarified that Section 79 is purely procedural, outlining the method of suing the government without conferring any substantive rights or causes of action.

  • Union of India v. R.C. Jall (1962): The Supreme Court ruled that when the railway is administered by the Union of India, any suit to enforce a claim against the railway administration should be brought against the Union of India, eliminating the need to make the railway administration a separate party.

ESSENTIALS OF FILING SUITS AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT

  1. Proper Party Designation:
    Ensure the government entity is correctly named as per Section 79 to avoid dismissal on technical grounds.

  2. Mandatory Notice:
    Serve a two-month prior notice under Section 80, detailing the cause of action and relief sought.

  3. Adherence to Timelines:
    Recognize the three-month waiting period post-decree before execution, as mandated by Section 82.

  4. Representation:
    Understand that the government will be represented by designated pleaders, and public officers may receive exemptions from personal appearances under certain conditions.

CONCLUSION

Sections 79 to 82 of the CPC, along with Order XXVII, establish a comprehensive legal framework for suits involving the government and public officers in India. These provisions balance the need for governmental accountability with safeguards against frivolous or hasty litigation, ensuring that such suits proceed with due diligence and respect for public administration.

Share this :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp