Reply to Applications under Section 33-C [2] of The Industrial Dispute Act 1947.
BEFORE THE HON’BLE COURT OF TAMIL NADU AT COIMBATORE
Application No:______ of 2008
Applicant/Workman
Versus
Respondent/Employer
Reply to Applications under Section 33-C [2] of The Industrial Dispute Act 1947.
Respectfully Sheweth:
Preliminary Submissions:
1. That the present application is not maintainable and the same is false and frivolous.
Reply on Merit: 1
. That the contents of this para of application are false and frivolous and hence denied.__
2. That the contents of this para of application are false and frivolous and hence denied.__
3. That the contents of this para of application are false and frivolous and hence denied.__
4. That the contents of this para of application are false and frivolous and hence denied.__
5. That the contents of this para of application are false and frivolous and hence denied. _
6. That the contents of this para of application are false and frivolous and hence denied.__
7. That the contents of this para of application are false and frivolous and hence denied.__
8. That the contents of this para of application are false and frivolous and hence denied. _
In view of above submissions, the present application deserves to be dismissed and may kindly be dismissed in the interest of justice with cost.
Coimbatore Respondent
______ Through, Advocates
AUTH. REP OF WORKMAN
VERIFICATION:
Verified that the contents of paras 1 to ________ of Preliminary Submissions and paras 1 to ________ of reply on merit are true and correct to the personal knowledge and belief of the applicant.
Verified at Coimbatore on ______.
Respondent
FORM-F
(See Rule 36)
Before the Hon’ble Labour Court of Tamil Nadu at Coimbatore
Reference No.:______ of 2008
Workmen
Versus
Employer
In the matter of ______above______ I/We hereby authorize _______ to represent me/us in the above matter.
Dated this ______.
Signature of persons nominating the representative
Address: as per memo of parties.
Accepted
Signature Of Representative
Address:
