Criminal Law (IPC/BNS) | PYQs Mains | LawFoyer

Criminal Law (IPC / BNS) Mains PYQs | LawFoyer
LawFoyer · Mains subjective question bank

Criminal Law (IPC / BNS) Mains Previous Year Questions (Subjective)

Topic-wise descriptive questions from UPSC Law Optional, UPPSC APO Mains, Uttarakhand HJS and historical Delhi Judicial Service papers. Original statutory references are preserved through source attribution; question wording is labelled as a faithful editorial paraphrase.

131 question occurrences13 topics23 source papers2005–2026

Checked on 4 November 2026 · Questions only · No model answers

Scope and source verification

This collection contains 131 attributable occurrences across 13 topics and 23 distinct paper sources, covering 2005–2026. 108 occurrences are linked to official source PDFs (Tier A); 23 are faithfully paraphrased from an identified historical paper reproduction (Tier B). Question subparts are counted individually where independently posed. Every occurrence appears as a separate card.

Historic Indian Penal Code wording has not been converted silently into BNS section references. The BNS took effect on 1 July 2024, apart from its Section 106(2), under the notified commencement. This bank contains questions only, without explanations or solutions.

A Tier A source means a question is identifiable from the official PDF; Tier B means an attributed reproduction was inspected, not an official original. These entries are editorial paraphrases, not exact quotations. Full factual scenarios should be read in their linked source papers.

Search and filter questions

131 question occurrences

General Principles, Mens Rea and Liability

12 question occurrences

CLPYQ0001 · Short answer

Explain mens rea and its treatment within the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 6(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0002 · Short answer

Explain the criminal-law principle that an act alone does not make a person guilty unless accompanied by a guilty mind, using cases.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2024 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0003 · Short answer

Explain why criminal liability ordinarily requires a prohibited act together with the requisite mental element.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2022 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0004 · Analytical

Examine why the criminal act and guilty mind must coincide to attract liability, using decided cases.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2020 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0005 · Short answer

Identify penal offences that may arise without establishing mens rea under the IPC.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2019 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0006 · Analytical

Discuss the relevance of mens rea when interpreting penal legislation.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2019 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 13 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0007 · Analytical

Discuss whether the common-law maxim concerning mens rea operates independently when interpreting the Indian Penal Code.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2018 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0008 · Analytical

Can breach of a contract to care for and supply the needs of a helpless person attract criminal punishment? Identify the relevant IPC rule and ingredients.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2018 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 9(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0009 · Problem

A lashes the horses pulling Z's chariot without Z's consent, intending or knowing injury, fright or annoyance may result. What offence has A committed?

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2018 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 9(b)(i) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0010 · Problem

A shows his fist intending Z to believe he is about to strike. Identify the offence.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2018 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 9(b)(ii) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0011 · Analytical

Examine how motive, nature of conduct and blameworthiness affect criminal liability where a statute may not require mens rea.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2016 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0012 · Analytical

Explain the statutory meaning of public servant with reference to relevant judicial decisions.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2015 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · Criminal Q3 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

General Exceptions, Insanity and Private Defence

22 question occurrences

CLPYQ0013 · Analytical

To what extent can a mistake of fact exclude mens rea? Distinguish justification from excuse and discuss whether the defence belongs in strict liability crimes.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2026 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0014 · Problem

A enters B's home to steal. B and family members surround and attack A with sticks. Believing his life is threatened, A fires a pistol and kills B. Evaluate A's criminal liability.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 1(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0015 · Analytical

Discuss why private defence is valuable but must be exercised reasonably, using examples.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2025 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0016 · Analytical

Examine the defence of intoxication, including impairment of perception and judgment, with reference to leading cases.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2024 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0017 · Short answer

Describe private defence of property, including its scope and limitations.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2023 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0018 · Short answer

Explain the scope and limits of the right of private defence even though self-protection is recognised by law.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2022 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(e) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0019 · Critical comment

Comment on the proposition that the right of private defence cannot be measured with mathematical precision.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2022 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 10 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0020 · Short answer

What constitutes legal insanity sufficient to excuse an accused from penal liability?

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2021 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0021 · Analytical

Discuss the burden placed on an accused claiming insanity under the IPC, with relevant decisions.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2021 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 9 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0022 · Short answer

Can an offender rely upon intoxication voluntarily induced by alcohol to escape IPC liability?

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2020 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0023 · Critical comment

Assess the proposition that private defence protects innocent persons and cannot be used to exact revenge.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2019 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0024 · Analytical

Examine the defence expressed by the proposition that conduct done against one's will is not one's voluntary act.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2019 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0025 · Problem

A surgeon honestly advises a patient that recovery is impossible, following which the patient dies from shock. Determine what offence, if any, arises.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2019 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 14(i) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0026 · Analytical

When may apprehension of death or grievous injury justify causing the attacker's death under the right of private defence?

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2018 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(e) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0027 · Short answer

Discuss criminal liability of a person acting while intoxicated under the IPC.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2018 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 9(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0028 · Short answer

Explain the requirements of good faith for the defence of mistake under the IPC General Exceptions.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2017 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0029 · Analytical

Distinguish legal from medical insanity. Describe the procedure before the Sessions Court where unsoundness of mind is claimed and the consequent legal steps if Section 84 IPC applies.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2017 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 7 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0030 · Analytical

Define consent and discuss the situations where consent operates as a lawful defence.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2017 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 8 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0031 · Analytical

Explain the defence of accident where a lawful act unintentionally causes an unforeseen consequence despite due care.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2016 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0032 · Analytical

Discuss the right of private defence of person and property with cases.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2015 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · Criminal Q4 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0033 · Distinction

Distinguish a mistake of fact from a mistake of law.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2008 · Criminal Law · 2(iv) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0034 · Short answer

Explain when the right of private defence of body and property extends to causing death.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2005 · Criminal Law · 2(b) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Abetment, Conspiracy and Joint Liability

23 question occurrences

CLPYQ0035 · Distinction

Define common intention and distinguish it from common object.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 6(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0036 · Analytical

Explain when an initially peaceful assembly can become an unlawful assembly.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 8(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0037 · Analytical

When several offenders act together, under what conditions may they incur joint and individual criminal responsibility?

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2025 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0038 · Analytical

Assess conspirators' responsibility for acts of other participants in pursuit of their shared criminal plan under the IPC.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2024 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0039 · Analytical

Discuss how liability for abetment depends on the abettor's intention, not merely on what the person abetted ultimately does.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2024 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0040 · Short answer

Illustrate constructive criminality in the law of abetment.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2023 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0041 · Distinction

Distinguish Section 34 IPC from Section 149 IPC in relation to the basis of collective criminal responsibility.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2022 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0042 · Analytical

Define unlawful assembly and describe when an assembly that began lawfully becomes unlawful, using illustrations.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2022 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0043 · Distinction

Explain how conspiracy is punished and distinguish conspiracy from abetment.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2021 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 10 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0044 · Problem

A instigates B, a person below 18 years, to commit suicide. Determine the offence committed by A.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2021 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 11 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0045 · Problem

A and B break a shop window at night to steal. The servant awakens; A stabs him while fleeing, and the servant dies next day after delayed treatment. Determine B's criminal liability.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2021 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 8 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0046 · Distinction

Compare constructive liability under Sections 34 and 149 IPC and explain their differences.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2020 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0047 · Short note

Write a short note on the principle of common intention.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2019 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 11(i) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0048 · Short note

Write a short note on criminal conspiracy.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2019 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 11(ii) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0049 · Analytical

Discuss the rationale and operation of Section 34 IPC where the individual contributions of participants cannot readily be separated.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2017 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0050 · Analytical

Explain the rationale for criminalising a conspiracy before the anticipated wrongful act has been completed.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2016 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0051 · Problem

X stabs a victim in the heart; Y strikes the head with a stick; their father Z remains nearby to protect his sons. Assess the criminal liability of X, Y and Z for the victim's murder.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2015 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · Criminal Q1 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0052 · Analytical

Examine the overlap, if any, among abetment, conspiracy and common intention.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2010 · Criminal Law · Part B Q5 · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0053 · Distinction

Distinguish common intention from common object.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2008 · Criminal Law · 2(v) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0054 · Distinction

Distinguish abetment from criminal conspiracy.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2008 · Criminal Law · 2(vi) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0055 · Short answer

Define an abettor and explain the extent of an abettor's liability.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2005 · Criminal Law · 3(b) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0056 · Problem

Four persons enter the victim's room armed with sticks; one instigates the attack and an intervening servant is hurt. One participant is not alleged to have struck anyone. Analyse the issue of liability under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2005 · Criminal Law · 6(a) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0057 · Distinction

Distinguish constructive liability under Section 34 from liability under Section 149 IPC.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2005 · Criminal Law · 6(b) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Attempt and Stages of Crime

4 question occurrences

CLPYQ0058 · Analytical

Is attempt defined in the IPC? Explain the tests used to distinguish preparation from an attempt, referring to cases.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2021 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0059 · Analytical

Discuss why preparation for an offence may escape punishment whereas an attempt to commit the offence may be punishable.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2019 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 12 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0060 · Analytical

Explain the proximity requirement that distinguishes criminal attempt from preparatory acts, with cases.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2017 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0061 · Problem

Analyse attempted murder where A shoots but misses, and where A fires at B believing him asleep although B had died earlier.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2006 · Criminal Law · 2(b) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Culpable Homicide, Murder and Negligent Death

22 question occurrences

CLPYQ0062 · Essay

How does penal law distinguish planned killing from homicide arising in a sudden fight? Discuss the relevant statutory rules.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2026 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0063 · Problem

A fires at a bird intending to kill and steal it but accidentally kills a person hidden behind a bush, whom A did not know was present. Determine the offence.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0064 · Problem

A tries to pick B's pocket; a pistol inside the pocket accidentally discharges and B dies. Discuss A's criminal liability.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 2(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0065 · Essay

Discuss the BNS doctrine of grave and sudden provocation and its impact on culpability for murder, with reference to cases.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 6(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0066 · Distinction

Explain the concept of homicide, distinguishing culpable homicide amounting to murder from culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2025 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0067 · Short answer

How does the gravity of rashness or negligence affect liability for causing death under Section 304A IPC?

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2024 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0068 · Short answer

Discuss the operation of transferred malice within IPC provisions on culpable homicide.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2023 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0069 · Short note

Write a brief note on transferred malice in penal law.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2022 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 13(d) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0070 · Analytical

Explain why murder is a species of culpable homicide but not every culpable homicide amounts to murder, with cases.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2022 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 8 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0071 · Short answer

Discuss grave and sudden provocation as a defence to a charge of murder under the IPC.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2021 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0072 · Analytical

Examine how Section 300 IPC covers different mental states and the extent to which awareness of the likelihood of death is required.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2020 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0073 · Distinction

Distinguish hurt from culpable homicide and murder, considering their overlapping ingredients.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2019 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0074 · Problem

A strikes Z intending permanent facial disfigurement. The face is not permanently disfigured, but Z suffers severe bodily pain for twenty days. Identify the offence.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2019 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 14(ii) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0075 · Distinction

Explain the fine distinction between culpable homicide amounting to murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2019 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 7 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0076 · Analytical

Explain the application of Section 300's fourth clause where the offender's awareness of the probability of death approaches practical certainty.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2018 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0077 · Distinction

Examine the distinction between culpable homicide and murder in relation to differing probabilities of death.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2017 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0078 · Analytical

Discuss the exception to murder where homicide results from an unpremeditated sudden fight in the heat of passion.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2016 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0079 · Judgment writing

A woman is set alight after a visitor pours kerosene on her. She makes two statements identifying the assailant before dying; her child witnesses part of the incident. Assess the homicide case using the conflicting prosecution and defence accounts, and draft a judgment.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2010 · Criminal Law · Part A Q1 · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0080 · Judgment writing

A murder conviction rests on an extra-judicial confession and recovery of blood-stained articles in a bus. Assess the parties' competing positions and write a judgment.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2010 · Criminal Law · Part A Q2 · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0081 · Problem

Four intoxicated young men drive at speed through a police stop, killing two police officers. Afterwards they remove a body and repair and repaint the car. Assess liability under the homicide, negligence and evidence-concealment provisions of the IPC.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2008 · Criminal Law · 1(B) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0082 · Judgment writing

Two brothers quarrel over family partition. One attacks with a gandasa; the other wrests it away and delivers a fatal blow. Identify the relevant charge and write a reasoned judgment.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2007 · Criminal Law · 8 · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0083 · Problem

After a driver kills four persons through rash driving, distinguish the factors relevant to Section 304 IPC and Section 304A IPC.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2006 · Criminal Law · 3(b) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Sexual Offences, Women and Children

12 question occurrences

CLPYQ0084 · Problem

A 25-year-old promises an 18-year-old that he will marry her if she agrees to intercourse. She initially resists, then agrees after repeated assurances. Fifteen days later he says by text that he will instead marry an NRI for career reasons. Determine the offence, if any, and discuss the BNS treatment of sexual acts induced by promises of marriage.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2026 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0085 · Problem

A 20-year-old student returning from college is restrained by a man, dragged into bushes, killed by a cut to her throat and then sexually assaulted after death. Identify the offences, if any, under the law governing the incident, with statutory support.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2023 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0086 · Distinction

Compare assault or criminal force intended to outrage a woman's modesty with sexual harassment under the IPC.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2023 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0087 · Analytical

Assess the effectiveness of IPC Sections 326A and 326B relating to acid attacks and the Supreme Court's additional directions in the Laxmi litigation.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2022 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0088 · Analytical

Consider whether consent to sexual intercourse procured through a false promise of marriage excludes criminal liability for rape.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2022 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0089 · Essay

Trace the development of Indian rape law from the Mathura case through the Nirbhaya reforms and later changes.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2021 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0090 · Problem

Would a woman who watches or records another woman engaged in a private act commit voyeurism under the IPC? Discuss.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2020 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0091 · Problem

A group jointly plans a rape; some participate physically, some assist, and one woman supplies facilities. Analyse the criminal liability of participants, non-participants and the woman under the common-intention rule.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2018 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0092 · Analytical

Identify and discuss the forms of conduct that were criminalised to protect women's modesty by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2017 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0093 · Short answer

Define voyeurism and state its punishment under the IPC.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2017 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 5 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0094 · Judgment writing

A schoolgirl aged 15 is reported missing and later recovered. Her statements and medical observations conflict. Consider the case under IPC Sections 363 and 376, and draft a reasoned judgment.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2010 · Criminal Law · Part A Q3 · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0095 · Problem

A 19-year-old persuades a 15-year-old to leave home by promising marriage and has sexual intercourse with her. Examine the offences where intercourse is consensual or non-consensual, where marriage is refused, and where the girl is instead 20 years old.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2007 · Criminal Law · 7(a) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Kidnapping and Abduction

5 question occurrences

CLPYQ0096 · Problem

A 13-year-old girl becomes separated from her maternal uncle at a crowded fair. A stranger takes her home intending marriage with his son. Assess whether kidnapping is established.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 2(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0097 · Distinction

Explain the distinction between kidnapping as a substantive offence and abduction becoming punishable when accompanied by a prohibited purpose.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2024 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0098 · Distinction

Distinguish kidnapping from abduction, riot from affray, and criminal breach of trust from dishonest misappropriation.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2021 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0099 · Distinction

Distinguish kidnapping from abduction.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2008 · Criminal Law · 2(ii) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0100 · Problem

A 15-year-old girl leaves home to avoid a forced marriage and goes to a 20-year-old whom she loves; he takes her to Bengaluru. Present arguments for and against kidnapping liability.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2007 · Criminal Law · 7(b) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Theft, Robbery, Dacoity and Property Offences

10 question occurrences

CLPYQ0101 · Analytical

Assess the proposition that theft protects possession rather than ownership, and discuss changes made to theft law by the BNS, 2023.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2026 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0102 · Analytical

Analyse dacoity as an aggravated property offence and explain its relationship with theft and robbery, referring to relevant statutory rules and cases.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2025 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0103 · Distinction

Explain the role of dishonest intention in theft and distinguish theft from dishonest misappropriation of property.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2023 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0104 · Analytical

Explain why the ingredients of theft or extortion are necessary for robbery or dacoity.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2020 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0105 · Problem

A opens another person's box to steal jewels, finds it empty, and places inside it a currency note previously stolen from a third person. Determine the offences committed.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2019 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0106 · Short note

Write a short note on theft.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2019 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 11(iii) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0107 · Problem

Six persons attempt a bank dacoity but flee when police intervene; one kills a person obstructing escape. Analyse collective liability with reference to IPC Sections 391 and 396.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2018 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0108 · Short answer

Explain the relationship of robbery to theft and extortion.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2017 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0109 · Distinction

Distinguish robbery from dacoity.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2008 · Criminal Law · 2(iii) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0110 · Problem

Four persons plan and execute an armed bank robbery. During escape B seriously wounds a guard; C shoots his own enemy at a bus stop. Determine the offences attributable to each accused.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2005 · Criminal Law · 2(a) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Dishonesty, Trust, Cheating and Forgery

6 question occurrences

CLPYQ0111 · Short answer

Define criminal breach of trust and identify its essential ingredients.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 8(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0112 · Distinction

Compare theft, dishonest misappropriation and criminal breach of trust through the way possession of another's property is acquired.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2024 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0113 · Distinction

Distinguish cheating from forgery.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2022 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 11 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0114 · Distinction

Distinguish criminal breach of trust from criminal misappropriation.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2017 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 9(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0115 · Distinction

Distinguish dishonest misappropriation from criminal breach of trust.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2008 · Criminal Law · 2(i) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0116 · Drafting

A stolen scooter is recovered from B following A's disclosure. Frame appropriate charges and discuss whether Section 34 IPC applies to possession of the property.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2006 · Criminal Law · 4(a) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Offences Against State, Reputation and Public Order

6 question occurrences

CLPYQ0117 · Comparative

Compare the IPC offence of sedition with the BNS provision concerning acts endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India. What changed?

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2026 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(e) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0118 · Critical comment

Examine whether the law of defamation gives excessive protection to reputation at the cost of freedom of speech.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2025 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0119 · Problem

A landholder knows that murder occurred on his estate but wilfully reports to the Magistrate that the victim died after a snakebite. Determine the offence.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2019 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 14(iii) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0120 · Short answer

What constitutes disobedience to an order duly promulgated by a public servant, and how is it punishable?

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2018 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 6(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0121 · Problem

A is legally bound by a District Judge's summons to attend as a witness but intentionally fails to appear. What offence has A committed?

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2018 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 6(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0122 · Critical comment

Critically discuss whether Section 124A IPC is compatible with freedom of speech and the constitutional limits on restrictions.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2016 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Punishment, Sentencing and Penal Reform

4 question occurrences

CLPYQ0123 · Short answer

How can community service as a penal sanction be used to address problems within a local community?

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2026 · Law Optional Paper II · Q1(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0124 · Essay

Trace Indian criminal law concerning attempted suicide and discuss the effect of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2022 · Law Optional Paper II · Q4(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0125 · Critical comment

Examine the propriety of judicial directions converting a death sentence into life imprisonment with a minimum actual period of custody.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2020 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0126 · Analytical

Explain cumulative punishment, giving examples and discussing the interaction of IPC punishment rules with CrPC provisions.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2018 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 5 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Marriage, Dowry and Domestic Cruelty

4 question occurrences

CLPYQ0127 · Essay

Critically examine principal offences against marriage in Indian criminal law with support from judicial decisions.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2025 · Law Optional Paper II · Q3(c) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0128 · Short answer

Discuss the meaning and practical assessment of the expression soon before in IPC Section 304B.

Asked in: Uttarakhand Higher Judicial Service Mains · 2022 · Direct Recruitment Paper 2 · 9 · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0129 · Analytical

Evaluate the effect of recent judicial decisions on the operation of Section 498A IPC.

Asked in: UPSC Civil Services Mains: Law Optional · 2019 · Law Optional Paper II · Q2(b) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper
CLPYQ0130 · Problem

A husband is tried under IPC Sections 304B and 201 following his wife's death by extensive burns. The paper sets out dowry complaints, suspected extramarital relations, an open kerosene can, burns to the husband, delay in hospitalisation and the deceased's statement. Determine liability on the stated circumstances.

Asked in: Delhi Judicial Service Mains · 2008 · Criminal Law · 1(A) · B: Attributed secondary transcription · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

New BNS Offences and Legislative Changes

1 question occurrences

CLPYQ0131 · Short answer

Explain organised crime, terrorist act and snatching as criminal-law concepts.

Asked in: UPPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer Mains · 2025 · Criminal Law and Procedure (Paper 54) · 8(a) · A: Official PDF · Faithful editorial paraphrase. Open source paper

Original examination papers and archive links

Coverage audit and limitations

Coverage: 108 official-source occurrences, 23 attributed-secondary occurrences. Official sources: UPSC Law Optional Paper II (2016–2026), UPPSC APO 2025 and Uttarakhand HJS 2015–2022 (selected cycles). Secondary sources: Delhi Judicial Service 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2010.

Gaps: This is a verified partial compilation, not every question ever asked nationwide. Recent state Civil Judge, HJS, prosecutor and law-officer papers from many states were not completely retrievable or inspected. Excluded were prelims MCQs, procedure-only questions and uncorroborated coaching claims. No BNS reference has been inserted into historical question wording as a substitute for the original IPC framework.

Share this :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp