The Doctrine of Waiver allows individuals to voluntarily relinquish a known legal right or privilege. In India, this doctrine does not extend to fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. Indian courts have consistently held that fundamental rights cannot be waived, emphasizing their paramount importance in safeguarding individual liberties.

MEANING AND DEFINITION

A waiver involves the intentional and voluntary abandonment of a known right. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, it is “the voluntary relinquishment or abandonment—express or implied—of a legal right or advantage.” In the Indian legal context, while individuals may waive certain statutory or contractual rights, they cannot waive fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

The concept of waiver has roots in common law, where individuals could choose to forgo certain legal rights. In India, the application of this doctrine has been carefully scrutinized, especially concerning constitutional rights. The judiciary has played a pivotal role in delineating the boundaries of this doctrine to ensure that fundamental rights remain inviolable.

ESSENTIALS OF A VALID WAIVER

For a waiver to be considered valid, the following elements must be present:

  • Knowledge: The individual must have full awareness of the right they are relinquishing and understand the consequences of such an action.
  • Intention: There must be a clear intention to waive the right, which can be expressed explicitly through words or implicitly through conduct.
  • Voluntariness: The decision to waive the right must be made freely, without any coercion or undue influence.

APPLICATION IN INDIAN LAW

In India, while the Doctrine of Waiver applies to certain legal rights, it does not extend to fundamental rights. The Supreme Court has consistently held that individuals cannot waive their fundamental rights, as these rights are integral to the Constitution’s framework and public policy.

KEY CASE LAWS

  1. Behram Khurshid Pesikaka v. State of Bombay, AIR 1955 SC 123:
    In this case, the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are based on principles embodied in the Constitution’s preamble and cannot be waived. The court emphasized that these rights are a matter of public policy and are non-negotiable.

  2. Olga Tellis & Ors v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, AIR 1986 SC 180:
    Pavement dwellers gave an undertaking that they would not claim any fundamental right to put up huts on pavements. When the huts were demolished, they pleaded protection under Article 21. The Supreme Court ruled that fundamental rights cannot be waived and that there can be no estoppel against the Constitution.

  3. Basheshar Nath v. Commissioner of Income Tax, 1959 AIR 149:
    The petitioner contended that the agreement he entered into with the tax authorities violated his fundamental rights. The Supreme Court held that fundamental rights cannot be waived by any individual, as they are guaranteed by the Constitution for the benefit of all citizens.

LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

While individuals can waive certain legal rights, the following limitations apply:

  • Fundamental Rights: Cannot be waived, as they are essential to individual freedom and public policy.
  • Public Interest: Rights conferred for public benefit cannot be waived if such waiver would be detrimental to public interest.

COMPARISON WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS

In contrast to India, some countries allow individuals to waive certain constitutional rights. For instance:

  • In the United States, individuals can waive specific rights, such as the right to a jury trial, under certain conditions. However, even in such jurisdictions, the waiver must be made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.

CONCLUSION

The Doctrine of Waiver in India underscores the sanctity of fundamental rights, ensuring they remain inviolable and beyond the reach of individual waiver. This principle reinforces the Constitution’s commitment to safeguarding individual liberties and upholding public policy.

REFERENCES

  1. Drishti Judiciary. “Doctrine of Waiver in Indian Constitution.”
  2. iPleaders. “Doctrine of Waiver.”
  3. Leverage Edu. “Doctrine Of Waiver in India: Meaning, Judgements.”
  4. EduRev. “Doctrine of Waiver.”
  5. SCC Online. “Explained: Waiver | An intentional relinquishment of a right; an agreement not to assert a right: Supreme Court.”
Share this :
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Leave a Reply